On March 21, 2016, the Unites States Supreme Court (USSC) granted a petition by Samsung Electronics Co. (Samsung) to hear an appeal from a particular aspect of the damages awarded against Samsung in the widely reported patent infringement finding against Samsung and in favour of Apple Inc (Apple).  The USSC will hear argument on the following question:  where a design patent relating to only a component of a product is infringed, should an award of infringer profits be limited to those profits attributable to that particular component?

As a brief review of this case: at the district court level, a jury awarded Apple more than $1 billion dollars in total damages, which included damages for Samsung’s infringement of Apple’s trade dress and its utility and design patents.  For those damages relating to infringement of Apple’s design patents, the jury awarded Apple the entire profit earned by Samsung from sales of infringing smartphones.  Samsung appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) and lost; however, the CAFC vacated that portion of the damages relating to trade dress, reducing Apple’s total award to $548 million: $149 million for utility patent infringement and $399 million for design patent infringement.  The CAFC refused to re-hear the appeal en banc.  The USSC will now hear argument on whether Apple is entitled the $399 million amount, comprising Samsung’s entire profits from sale of infringing smartphones.

For prior reporting on this case in E-TIPS® newsletter, click here and here.

E-TIPS® ISSUE

16 04 06

Disclaimer: This Newsletter is intended to provide readers with general information on legal developments in the areas of e-commerce, information technology and intellectual property. It is not intended to be a complete statement of the law, nor is it intended to provide legal advice. No person should act or rely upon the information contained in this newsletter without seeking legal advice.

E-TIPS is a registered trade-mark of Deeth Williams Wall LLP.