In its opinion dated June 15, 2004 (DirecTV, Inc v Treworgy), the US 11th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that section 2520 of the Wiretap Act, 1986 (Wiretap Act), does not create a private right of action arising from mere possession of access devices. DirecTV, Inc (DirecTV) brought suit against a Florida resident, Mike Treworgy, who had two pirated access cards for the DirecTV system. DirecTV filed a claim for the illegal possession and use of the cards under Section 2512(a) of the Wiretap Act. The Court noted that this cause of action arises "against any person who intercepts, discloses, or uses, or procures any other person to intercept, disclose, or use" pirated equipment. Without more, the mere possession of equipment capable of being used for prohibited purposes was not sufficient to attract liability. This is the first appellate decision on the question, there being a substantial number of conflicting District Court cases, and tens of thousands of claims filed by DirecTV. In Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Bell ExpressVu v Rex confirmed that Section 9(1)(c) of the Radiocommunication Act is intended to protect both Canadian and foreign signals from unauthorized decoding. While the Canadian case was brought against an equipment vendor, and no case has yet proceeded against an end-user, it is generally understood that end-users may also be charged, and that the legislation contemplates the possibility of civil remedies for satellite TV distributors. For the complete text of the decision in Direct TV, Inc v Treworgy, June 15, 2004 03-15313 (11th Cir), see: http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200315313.pdf. For related commentary, visit: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1087242917143. The Supreme Court of Canada decision in Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v Rex [2002] 2 S.C.R. 599, can be found at: http://makeashorterlink.com/?A5C724226. For a previous article in E-TIPSâ„¢ on the topic, "Canadian Satellite Pirates Beware!", see: http://makeashorterlink.com/?S41325F98. Summary by: Nicholas Whalen

E-TIPS® ISSUE

04 06 23

Disclaimer: This Newsletter is intended to provide readers with general information on legal developments in the areas of e-commerce, information technology and intellectual property. It is not intended to be a complete statement of the law, nor is it intended to provide legal advice. No person should act or rely upon the information contained in this newsletter without seeking legal advice.

E-TIPS is a registered trade-mark of Deeth Williams Wall LLP.