In the recent case of
Kohus v. Mariol, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit considered the legal standard to be applied in copyright infringement cases to determine whether there is substantial similarity between works.
The Court reviewed the current U.S. case law on substantial similarity and decided to adopt the two step approach taken by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in
Sturdza v. United Arab Emirates. The first step is the identification of which aspects of the artist's work, if any, are protectible by copyright. The second step is the determination of whether the allegedly infringing work is substantially similar to the protectible elements in the artist's work.
Until
Kohus v. Mariol, the Sixth Circuit had no legal standard for determining substantial similarity in copyright infringement cases.
For a copy of
Kohus v. Mariol, visit:
http://pacer.ca6.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/getopn.pl?OPINION=03a0150p.06
For a copy of
Sturdza v. United Arab Emirates
http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200203/00-7279a.txt
Summary by: Sue Diaz
Concerned about your company's intellectual property rights? Contact
Victor Butsky (
vbutsky@dww.com) or
Jennifer Jannuska (
jjannuska@dww.com) at DWW.
Disclaimer: This Newsletter is intended to provide readers with general information on legal developments in the areas of e-commerce, information technology and intellectual property. It is not intended to be a complete statement of the law, nor is it intended to provide legal advice. No person should act or rely upon the information contained in this newsletter without seeking legal advice.
E-TIPS is a registered trade-mark of Deeth Williams Wall LLP.